Independent curator Kim Simon (left) joins Reena Katz in the battle to salvage Katz’s art show.
Photo By Steve Payne
Cover Story

The show you won’t see…
The Koffler Centre was all for Reena Katz’s love letter to Kensington – until it got wind of her views on Israel

The Bellevue Square Park wading pool on this cloudy, cool day is empty, just a slightly recessed circle of concrete. But I’m imagining it filled, not with water but with a pack of eighth graders playing in a mah-jong tournament with six elderly Jewish women.

That was Reena Katz’s idea, part of the four-pronged art project Each Hand As They Are Called, designed to probe the social history of Kensington Market. It was a show originally commissioned by the Koffler Gallery via independent curator Kim Simon and later brought into a marketing partnership with the Luminato festival.

You may not see any of it, though. Last month, in a startling move, the Koffler suddenly dissociated itself from the exhibit and specifically from Katz herself, though it left the project funding intact. The reason? The Koffler Centre for the Arts believes that Katz’s anti-Zionist views on Israel violate the centre’s core values.

Here we are again in the middle of the seething Middle East debate. Add this furor to the one over the Rachel Corrie play that CanStage couldn’t bring itself to mount, and to the Passe Muraille’s staging of Seven Jewish Children, a piece by Caryl Churchill about the psychic harm done to Israelis by the occupation, which drew heat from B’nai Brith. 

But this one’s different. The artist isn’t an import, but a homegrown Jewish girl, a queer and a Jewish studies teacher no less (disclosure: my daughter was in her class), an activist who embraces her culture and is deeply loyal to her ancestry.

And the art project in dispute isn’t about conflict in a far-off desert, but celebrates Judaism’s Toronto roots.  (See The Show That Got Away, this page.)

Is mainstream Judaism picking on the wrong dissident?

“‘Core Jewish values,’” Katz muses, sitting in a Kensington café, her voice trembling with a combo of anger and upset. “What is a core Jewish value? Tikkun olam [Hebrew for “making the world a better place”]. I was raised to love my culture. Why is it that my thinking doesn’t come from Jewish values and theirs does?”

Cue the Talmudic scholars, please.  Koffler Centre executive director Lori Starr has her version of how the covenant got broken. She recalls how, while trying to arrange a celebration of Katz’s show Each Hand As They Are Called, she clicked on Katz’s Facebook page and noticed the Israeli Apartheid Week icon. She also discovered that Katz had signed a petition calling for Zionism to be relegated to the “dustbin of history.”

Starr right away knew she had a problem. “To refer to Israel as an apartheid state is to call Israel a criminal state and to suggest that it be shut down,” Starr says.

But what took her so long to figure out that Katz has radical views? “I knew Reena did critical work based on human rights,” says curator Simon, “and I did say to Mona [Filip, the Koffler Gallery’s curator] that Reena did activist work around Palestine/Israel.”

“It’s all over my website,” says Katz. “They could have done the research a year and a half ago, when we began the project.”

Starr allows that the Koffler team may have missed something when the work was originally commissioned. “We learned a valuable lessons about the level of due diligence required of us,” she says, measuring her words carefully. But she doesn’t accept that the Koffler’s decision to dissociate itself from the show is tantamount to scrapping it.

“The future of the show was left to the artist,” she insists.

Not so fast. That assessment seems more than a bit disingenuous and underestimates the way mainstream Jewish organizations in Toronto can close ranks. Within two days of the Koffler’s notice to community members, the Baycrest Centre and a vocal coach backed out, seriously setting back the whole enterprise (see The End Of The Line). 

“We had a great working relationship with Baycrest [social worker] Bianca Stern,” says Katz. “I was ready to negotiate. For the whole next week I was negotiating. In the end, she refused a meeting. She said she told the group [of elders] what was going on and they didn’t want to participate. I asked if I could speak to them myself and she said no.” 

Stern wouldn’t talk to NOW, and Baycrest spokesperson Kelly Connolly wouldn’t either, sending instead a terse note explaining that the institution couldn’t support the exhibit and neither would the six Jewish elders.

“It reminded me of how I felt when I couldn’t come out to my community,” says Katz. “It was a very closeted feeling, as if there were a fortress around my elders and I couldn’t penetrate it, not because of my actions but because of how my actions and thoughts are being perceived.”

The disconnect between what Katz thinks and what Starr and other representatives of official Jewry think she thinks is a key component of this controversy.

Howard English, vice-president of communications at the United Jewish Appeal, one of the Koffler’s funders, tells me, “When somebody says Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians is not fair, therefore Israel should not exist as a Jewish state, I draw the line.” 

The word “apartheid,” he says, is “used as a propaganda term to delegitimize Israel, which is the first step in the pursuit of the demise of the Jewish state.”

English maintains that mainstream Jewish organizations have no problem with those who criticize Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. If that’s true, it represents a significant shift, but before anyone starts celebrating this development, it should be noted that English goes on to say that these orgs will not, on principle, even dialogue with those who want to alter the Jewish character of Israel or, by inference, those who support a binational Jewish/Palestinian state.

But Katz says her critics aren’t attuned to the massive spectrum of Jewish opinion on the Mideast dispute and that none of them even asked her what her views are. Here’s what she would have told them: “We have to make a separation between anti-Zionism as a position and a prescription for the future of the region. 

“As Jews, we need to look at the history of what we’ve done in the region, stop abusing the human rights of Palestinians and work together to find a coexistent answer to this global problem. One-state solution? Two-state? I’m not even going there – that’s for the people in the region to decide.”

Simon and Katz are hoping to salvage something of the exhibit. That depends on whether the budget holds and if the Koffler will accept changes in the project.

“My relationship to every single aspect of the project has changed, and I’m not willing to pretend that it hasn’t and do this sweet little reverent piece,” Katz says.

“There’s so much fear, and I have compassion for that fear. This is why it breaks my heart that they’ve made me into the devil, because I have so much compassion for the force of pain that comes from the Holocaust. 

“I’m the one in my family who bothered to learn Yiddish. I’m the one who bothered to study klezmer, who bothered to perform it, who went to Poland because that’s where my grandmother’s from. 

“I’m the wrong person to vilify.”

The end of the line

May 8 Koffler Centre executive director Lori Starr calls Reena Katz and independent curator Kim Simon into a morning meeting to inform the team that, because of Katz’s views on Israel, the centre is dissociating itself from Each Hand As They Are Called. Funding is intact and the show will go on, promises Starr, but Koffler’s name and logo cannot be connected to it.

• Barely an hour later, Starr sends out a memorandum to friends of the centre, other Jewish institutions and associates of the gallery announcing the decision and the reason for it.

• By afternoon, Baycrest has pulled its support, effectively eliminating the mah-jong component.

• By the weekend, vocal coach Stella Walker, a collaborator on the Barry Sisters component, has withdrawn from the project.

May 13 Ongoing negotiations with the Koffler over changes to budgets and elements of the project mean that Cecilia Berkovic’s posters are late going to the printer. Practically all aspects of Each Hand are seriously affected.

May 14 The show fails to open on the original opening date.

May 29 Luminato announces that the mah-jong component of Each Hand is cancelled.

To date Lawyers for Katz and the Koffler Centre continue negotiations to determine the future of the project.

susanc@nowtoronto.com

 

NOW | June 3-10, 2009 | VOL 28 NO 40
Copyright 2010 NOW Communications
Comments
Posted by Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha on 06/04/2009, 11:25 AM
Great article! Thank you, NOW, for getting it, and Reena, we stand with you! For justice and a transformed world.

Posted by Yeah Right on 06/04/2009, 12:08 PM
Per above: "..an activist who embraces her culture and is deeply loyal to her ancestry.."

That's both inaccurate and patronizing at the same time.

Reena has been exposed supporting the exterminationist, antisemitic and pro-terror Israel Apartheid movement.

This puts her in basic conflict with the continued existence of both Israel and Jews, no matter what she says now.

Posted by Nick Van der Graaf on 06/04/2009, 12:21 PM
This is so exasperating. Why is it that Israeli Jews can debate the merits of Zionism or various aspects of public policy to their hearts content, but for Canadian Jews there are huge areas of the debate which are not allowed?? This is nonsensical!

I hope more Canadian Jews will stand up and say they want a free and open debate within their own community and not put up with this censorious bullying.

Posted by Go Reena! on 06/04/2009, 03:29 PM
The Koffler Centre thought it could blacklist Reena and shut her play down by denouncing her within the community. They made a serious miscalculation, and Reena will be made a star because of it. When will the Zionists learn that censorship only brings them more enemies and makes people realize their arguments can't stand up to debate?

Posted by JoJo on 06/04/2009, 05:27 PM
Nick:

Debate about the Middle East is absolutely acceptable; even required. But calling Israel an "Apartheid State," and all the other anti-Semitic, anti-Israel inferences associated with that, is NOT a debate. It's a hateful, inaccurate, violence-inciting judgement on a country that is simply defending itself against terrorism. Yes, some of the most virulant anti-Semites are Jewish, and they don't even realize it.

I will absolutely boycott the exhibit, as I think all Jews should.

Posted by Baruch on 06/04/2009, 07:07 PM
Jo Jo is very badly informed and also shows how closely tied s/he is to Israeli mythology. On top of that, s/he raises the old saw about how "some of the most virulent anti-Semites are Jewish and they don't even realize it" - ie. that they are anti-Semites. What nonesense!

Claiming that Israel practices apartheid in the West Bank (as it once did in Gaza before the settlers were pulled out - now they are in a virtual prison) is an accurate description of what Israel has fomented there. The word rankles and upsets the Jewish establishment as well as a lot of well-meaning Jews. The former have decided to interpret it's meaning as calling for Israel's destruction. That way they don't have to deal with and debate the facts.

The question of whether what goes on *inside* Israel proper (ie. the so-called "green line", or 1949 cease fire lines) can be termed apartheid is far less clear and is worthy of discussion. There's no doubt at all that Israel discriminates against its Arab citizens. There are numerous objective studies that prove this, such as the Orr Commission Report (2003) , and the findings of Sikkuy (Association for the Advancement of Civic Equality in Israel), an Israeli Jewish-Arab NGO that developed and publishes factually based "Equality Indexes" to gauge the degrees of equality achieved for all Israeli citizens: . Some objective observers have said that despite improvements in recent years the situation is still as close to being outright racism as one can get.

The Koffler Centre and UJA-Fed, together with Baycrest and all their minions, have jumped into quicksand over their leadership's myopic vision of the Jewish community. They may even believe the propaganda they have been pitching over "core values" and so on. These are so "core" that they are nowhere on their Web sites! Indeed Koffler says: "The views expressed by any artist in any exhibition or public forum are their own and do not represent the views of the Koffler Centre of the Arts, its Board, and its affiliate organizations."

Let's see how Koffler does in securing future grants from public bodies such as the Toronto Arts Council when it has blatantly violated its own (and the TAC's) position on separation of the artist's vision and their political activities and beliefs. Ironicaly, in Reena Katz's case her artistic vision and project had nothing in it whatsoever about the Israel-Palestine conflict.

So boycott away, Jo Jo - it will be tough, since the Koffler and UJA-Fed, and Baycrest have all seen to it that the project cannot go on. And they have the chutzpe to say, as Lori Starr did in her remarks to Susan Cole, author of NOW's article, "The future of the show was left to the artist" - What BS!

Posted by Mordechai on 06/04/2009, 08:07 PM
You can post your concerns and many may be right. However the bottom line is that the Koffler Center has the right to establish and run its program any way it wishes. You don't have to like it but you cannot demand it conform with your way of thinking either.

Posted by Baruch on 06/05/2009, 04:09 AM
I couldn't agree with you more, Mordechai. But the Koffler is who carries the responsibility for all of this mess and they are trying to sneak away from it.

They were told of Reena's political activism re Israel right from the start, over a year ago. They have admitted not exercising due diligence. They also do not state what their "core values" are on their Web site, and they did not convey them to Reena or Kim at any time until just a couple of weeks ago. Yet they've been downloading the mess onto the artists, because they want to dodge the responsibility and avoid an investigation about the role played by the UJA-Federation. Do you know that about 7 or 8 of the Koffler's board members are ALSO members of the bvoard of UJA-Fed?

Also, if a community gallery and arts organization is going to exercise it's due right to pick and choose which artists it will associate with - not on the basis of their art but on the basis of their political beliefs and activities - then why should they be receiving PUBLIC funds to operate? In 2008 he Koffler Gallery got annual operating grants of $50,000 from the Toronto Arts Council and $32,500 from the Ontario Arts Council (see the TAC and OAC grant reports online). They should pay these back and be barred from further public funding, until they change their policy.

Posted by What is Anti-Semitism? on 06/05/2009, 09:10 AM
Here's a brief definition of Anti-Semitism from Wikipedia:

a term used to describe prejudice against or hostility towards Jews, often rooted in hatred of their religious/cultural/ethnic background.

Anti-Semitism is typically manifested in actions such as hatred, discrimination, violent acts, and state-sponsored attacks.

I think that "Anti-Semitism" is misappropriated by diasporic Jews to slander those with views which criticize the treatment of Palestinians by the Jewish State. It is misappropriation because they are using "Anti-Semitism" as if it means "any opinion which criticizes or questions the actions of Jews or the Jewish state of Israel." How can it be that having a critical opinion can be considered categorical hatred of the ethnic group in question? It makes no sense.

Although it makes no sense, it is a terribly effective tactic. It enforces the "us versus them" mindset which continues to divide people and distract from the original issues themselves. It is also an emotional defensive response. However, it stifles freedom of speech and blocks attempts to have rational discussions. If you'd like to see some interesting perspectives on Anti-Semitism within and beyond the borders of Israel, keep in a eye out for the documentary Defamation (dir Yoav Shamir), which screened at this year's HotDocs festival.

Posted by lots of blame to go around on 06/05/2009, 10:54 AM
Anyone with a passing acquaintance with UJA Federation knows that for all their claims of being "inclusive" when it comes to representing the diversity of the Jewish community, they will not tolerate any public criticism of Israel. Their response to Lori Starr's work was disgraceful but entirely predictable. Having said that, I believe that Reena Katz's decision to take money from UJA should also be called into question. If she is so passionately against Zionism and believes that it should be relegated to the "dustbin of history", why was she willing to take money from an organization that includes as part of its mandate support for and promotion of Zionist ideals? To claim that her piece was an expression of her Judaism that has nothing to do with her politics seems more than a little disingenuous. Just as UJA should not be taking money from the public purse to fund their political agenda, Reena Katz should not be taking money from a Zionist organization if she is against Zionism. Reena Katz has now been lionized as the Rachel Corrie of the art world. Her work will no longer be judged on its artistic merit but rather on her politics. No doubt, the free publicity has done wonders for her career, though I think that she has won a rather hollow victory.

Posted by LICHTAWOMAN on 06/05/2009, 01:21 PM
Thanks to NOW for covering this story. It is not just about Reena. It is about every (Jewish) artist speaking out in solidarity with Palestinian human rights. The Koffler has sent a clear message of blocklisting to all of us. I will not accept that Judaism is synonymous with zionism which is what the Koffler is implying by disassociating from Reena's exhibit. We will only be free when everyone is free.

Posted by russiandoeboi on 06/08/2009, 01:46 PM
mordechai points out that they have a right to bail. koffler is an art gallery though and art is about expression. suppressing reena katz is therefore very anti-art. furthermore she could have had another partner and put her work up without the hassles caused by flaky scared reneggers

Posted by Serge on 06/10/2009, 03:12 PM
As a Jew, I support the Koffler's position. Those who want to shriek apartheid and oppose "Zionism" -- that is, the Jewish people's right to exercise self-determination as those terms are defined under international law -- should feel free to work with any of the hundreds of other art galleries in Toronto, or to start their own. Like most Jews I know, I am all for debate, but not for ugly slurs which only entrench hostility (and violate Jewish law). A debate on the apppropriate policies for the Israeli government? Sign me up; like most Zionists I know (and the majority of the Israeli government itself), I disagree with lots of policies. Arrogant, self-aggrandizing harangues which try and turn every criticism of Israeli policy into a rejection of the existence of the State of Israel and, in most cases, a (racist) rejection of the very idea that there exists a Jewish people whose history and culture are rooted in the Middle East? I will not support that; those who do, there are many, many forums in which to do so enthusiastically -- like this fawning, front-page write-up from Toronto's largest entertainment weekly. (As an aside, Holocaust? Relevant, really? Is it possible there are some aspects of Jewish culture that are about something else, please?)

Posted by Jacob Levy on 06/17/2009, 05:53 AM
When someone criticizes Israel for its racism and is called an anti-Semite, those that are calling this person an anti-Semite are themselves behaving in an anti-Semitic way, since they are saying that Judaism (not Zionism or Israel) is racist.

Israel is not synonymous with Judaism and as such, criticism of Israel, regardless of its motivation, cannot be anti-Semitic, only anti-Israeli.

Those who call anti-Israeli views anti-Semitic are, themselves, anti-Semites.

Post a comment :

All comments are reviewed. HTML links are not allowed.

Leave this field empty

NOW Magazine on Facebook