News & Views

Swine flu silliness
The most popular myths about H1N1

Anyone else find it strange that there seems to be at least as much panic and fear of the H1N1 vaccine as there is of the virus itself?

Granted, people should not be panicking over either of these two, but misinformation and fear about the former has the potential to make the latter a much more dangerous situation than it needs to be.

The democratization of knowledge that the Internet has enabled can be a great thing. Unfortunately, it’s becoming more and more evident that many people have a hard time distinguishing uninformed opinions and established scientific fact.

Sure, scepticism is generally healthy, but not when distrust of the establishment leads people to fall for quackery and make dangerous choices for their children and themselves, choices which also endanger society as a whole.

We’re talking about the anti-vaccine paranoia and hysteria that has ramped up over the past decade, in large part thanks to the efforts of former Playboy model and mediocre actress Jenny McCarthy.

McCarthy has convinced herself (and a disturbingly large segment of the population) that the mercury in childhood vaccines caused her child to develop autism. Since she’s relatively famous, she managed to get a large amount of media attention for her pet cause, which is one of the factors that has led to many people declaring that they’d rather get sick than get the vaccine.

In an effort to clear through some of the vaccine hysteria, let’s take a look at the most common myth-based fears.

1. Mercury-laced preservatives in vaccines cause autism and/or mercury poisoning.

When a child becomes ill, the natural reaction is to look for something or someone to blame.

Unfortunately, there is absolutely nothing linking vaccines and autism, and no credible science to back up the claim. The fact is that you ingest much more mercury in a tuna sandwich (not to mention the large doses found in some sushi) than you’ll get in a shot of the H1N1 vaccine. If the amount of mercury in vaccines were actually dangerous, we’d be seeing massive health problems, and at least one of the many studies would have shown at something.

2. The “adjuvant” added to the vaccine to boost effectiveness hasn’t been tested and/or is dangerous.

The adjuvant used in Canada is made out of shark liver oil (squalene), vitamin E (DL-alpha-tocopherol), and an emulsifier (polysorbate 80) used in ice cream. Doesn’t sound so scary when you ignore the chemical names for these compounds, eh?

Health Canada is quite convinced that it’s safe, and say that it’s been tested on 45,000 people around the world. The adjuvant makes the vaccine much more effective, which means that available stocks of the vaccine can be stretched a lot further, while providing even better protection.

3. Squalene in anthrax vaccines was what caused Gulf War Syndrome.

Once again, this is wishful thinking on the part of those afflicted.

Yes, a lot of noise was made about a possible connection, and many studies were done, and absolutely no link was found. If that doesn’t convince you, consider that squalene has been in over 22 million vaccines in Europe since 1997, with no problems. If you’re still dubious, consider that squalene occurs naturally in the human body – you can find it in the oils of your fingerprints.

4. I don’t need the H1N1 vaccine because I never get the flu, and I’m young, clean and healthy.

Unlike the normal flu, the only people who have immunity to H1N1 are actually those above the age of 65, many of whom were exposed to a similar previous outbreak.  

Yes, most cases of H1N1 in healthy people is relatively mild (in that you feel like you were hit by a truck, but you’re not on a respirator).

Unfortunately, unlike the normal flu, young healthy people are among those who are developing serious cases that threaten their life. Your past history with the traditional flu is no indication of how you’ll handle this one. And even if you’re immune system is awesome and you get a very mild case, you’re spreading the virus around, as well as giving it a host where it can happily mutate into a strain that could potentially be much more devastating.

Better to contain it now with a vaccine than let it flourish into something we have no hope of containing.

5. I’m pregnant, and don’t want to hurt my unborn child with this vaccine.

There are two important points that should be addressed here. First of all, pregnant women are 4 to 5 times more likely to develop serious symptoms from H1N1, which in itself should be enough to make you realize that vague fears about a vaccine are not equivalent to the very real risks of the illness.

Second of all, while the World Health Organization is currently recommending that pregnant women get the non-adjuvanted vaccine, this is because they’re being very cautious due to a lack of data on this group, not because there is any evidence whatsoever that there’s any danger.

In fact, WHO say that all data suggests that the adjuvanted version is completely safe, and that if the non-adjuvanted version is not available in your area, you’re better off getting the adjuvanted version of the vaccine than nothing.

Since posting this, the World Health Organization has revised their position on pregnant women taking the adjuvanted version of the H1N1 vaccine.

The studies are in, and they are now telling us that there is "no evidence of direct or indirect harmful effects on fertility, pregnancy, development of the embryo or fetus, birthing, or post-natal development", and that pregnant women should get whichever vaccine is available in their area. They also note that between 7 and 10 percent of H1N1 patients whose symptoms are serious enough to require hospitalization are pregnant women, which is why they're among the groups who should be getting the vaccine first. 

6. The vaccine is a government mind control program.

Simple solution: buy aluminium foil from corner store. Make helmet. Relax. 

Oct 30, 2009 at 03:19 AM
Copyright 2009 NOW Communications
Comments
Posted by Harold L Doherty on 10/30/2009, 04:35 AM
Your comment mocks those with concerns about what is injected into their children. Aren't you clever?

The fact is that there have been public statements questioning the safety of the H1N1 vaccine by health care professionals and researchers:

http://autisminnb.blogspot.com/2009/08/swine-flu-h1n1-vaccine-safety.html

Perhaps you could show those you mock where you bought your tin foil?

Posted by hera on 10/30/2009, 01:07 PM
Thimerosal ( the mercury ingredient in some flu shots) has never been shown to be safe;read the MSDS sheet on line.Mercury eaten or drunk passes through the digestive system, and a fair amount gets removed from the body.Unfortunately injected mercury bypasses these safety mechanisms.Aluminium is also in some shots.And things that stimulate the immune system may be dangerous for those with immune system dysfunction. You say there would be wide spread problems if vaccines caused injury.How about a rate of autism of 1 in 68 in boys,(testosterone makes it harder to process toxic metals) and apparently still rising?? In the same time span we have increased the amount of vaccines given to babies from 10 before the age of five,(up til the 1980's) to 36 now, starting with one on the day of birth... The H1N1 flu shot is rated category c for pregnant moms; "not known if it will affect or damage the fetus and should only be given if clearly needed" Apparently what they meant to say was;"Its fine, its safe, give it to everyone". While people with their physicians advice have to make there own choices about the risks of the shot versus the risks of the flu, it is interesting to note that anyone who catches the H1N1 flu, after they recover will likely have some immunity for the next 30 years.The flu shot only gives 1 years' immunity.One could argue that if you wanted to help protect society from the H1N1 virus, catching it and recovering from it, if you did not expose others who were at high risk of health problems, would actually be pretty helpful. Just another point of view.

Posted by noSILLY on 10/30/2009, 03:43 PM
Awesome. I've been waiting for someone to say it! Now, mercury is not in either of the flu shots this year..they stopped using thimerosal in vaccines years ago (mostly so that people couldn't say the vaccine made their child sick, even though it wasn't the reason, anyway). As of right now, no one knows the cause of the rise in cases of Autism, but some believe that it's simply because we know more about it now and are able to properly diagnose. It could be the lifestyle we're leading as a society...what kind of toxins are in that hamburger you had for lunch??

Anyhoo, I will admit that there are risks with taking any vaccine (or medication, or driving a car for that matter). People who are allergic to eggs should not get the flu vaccine. People who have a history of auto-immune disorders in their family should not get the vaccine. If you're gonna be gullable enough to believe the hype created around the vaccine enough to not get it, wear a damn mask so I don't get sick, please.

Posted by hera on 10/30/2009, 04:15 PM
Nosilly; glad we agree about the auto immune disorders at least being a risk factor.

No thimerosal in flu shots?? Oh dear, who have you been reading? Thimerosal was taken out of most vaccines( or reduced to "trace" amounts and replaced with aluminium) was never in some ( reactions to the MMR for example are likely to be caused by the live virus in it, it never had thimerosal), but that multidose flu vial; the reason those shots can all be taken from the same vial is the 25 mcg of thimerosal in each shot.Please, look at a package insert. IT CONTAINS THIMEROSAL. Now if you have managed to track down one of the rare single dose pediatric flu shots, no thimerosal, otherwise, if it is coming from a multidose vial it has mercury.

Please fact check.

Posted by hera on 10/30/2009, 08:15 PM
Sorry nosilly; forgot to add;if you go to the CDC government website ( a google search of thimerosal CDC flu shot, will get you to the .gov site) you can confirm that per them, there is indeed thimerosal in most flu shots. By the way flumist doesn't contain the stuff; it does however contain a mild form of live virus, haven't found a primary source of info on whether or not, or for how long, the live virus can be shedded and the vaccinated perosn is potentially infectious to those with weakened immune systems; one person quoted two weeks. Don't know if it is correct or not, but better hope that if so, we aren't giving that form to health care professionals! Re me giving you the swine flu; don't worry, you're safe, its already been and gone in my family ( the longest person sick had it for about 5 days)so we have that potential 30 year immunity happening.Probably the safest people you could hang out with..Next year of course, you could catch it again, or may need another shot.We should still have some immunity. All the best.

Posted by nosilly on 10/30/2009, 08:27 PM
I apologize. I work in a hospital and am 2nd priority for distribution of the H1N1 vaccine, and received it yesterday. I was told by a nurse a few days ago that no longer do they use thimerosal in vaccines. SOME multidose vials of the injectable vaccine contain thimerosal. CDC recommends that pregnant women receive the vaccination without it, but that it is more likely to be harmful to not get the vaccine than it is to get the vaccine with thimerosal. Multiple studies have shown that there is no correlation between the vaccine (and thimerosal in it) causing autism.

Posted by Skip Holcombe on 11/02/2009, 09:45 AM
You get the anthrax shot and the H1N1 every single year....then come see me in 10 yrs. FOOL.

I was forced by the military to get the Swine Flu shot in 1976 and was hospitalized for over a week from the results of this forced vaccination.

If there is any of that vaccine left over you should get some of that stuff to and call me in a year.

Posted by A dose of common sense on 11/03/2009, 04:59 AM
Everybody's body is different. Some people have varying degrees of food sensitivities or allergies. I have an autoimmune disease that forces me to not injest certain food items permanently. On the other hand, my hubby could live on shoe leather and pickled pigs snout. He doesn't react to anything. So don't write like such an arrogant jackass Benjamin. Sometimes, unless you have lived an experience you can't relate. So, I suggest you be careful. As for Ms. McCarthy, do your research. Jenny McCarthy is NOT against vaccines. She has expressed concern about the "content" of vaccines and the number of vaccines issued in a particular length of time.

c.2009

Post a comment :

All comments are reviewed.

NOW DAILY
SATURDAY | NOV | 21 | 2009

NOW Audio player

NXNE