Residents pushing for electric trains say there’s no such thing as clean diesel tech.
Photo By R. Jeanette Martin
News

Metrolinx fails to clear the air on electric train
Clean Train Coalition blows the whistle on province’s diesel fix

Based strictly on appearances, it seems that the province compromises whenever it’s been on the hot seat over the controversial rail link to the airport and Georgetown GO expansion.

But does it really?

On October 6, Environment Minister John Gerretsen gave the project the green light but demanded that Metrolinx use a cleaner diesel 4 technology. The ministry says the engine revamp, in combo with low-sulphur diesel fuels, would reduce particulate matter by 90 per cent and nitrogen oxides by 80 per cent over current GO engines when the project comes online in 2015. 

Sounds dramatic, but Clean Train Coalition folks aren’t holding their breath. “Diesel exhaust,” says the group’s statement, “is a known health hazard, and any further pollution in Toronto’s already overburdened airshed is not acceptable.”

But the biggest snag in the diesel 4 plan, says Clean Train’s Keith Brooks, is that these trains do not yet exist. The fact is, this tech isn’t ready and would require a costly engine rebuild that some estimate might almost double the vehicles’ current price. 

When I ask James O’Mara, enviro planning and policy head at Metrolinx, for his take on the price tag, he says, “Tier 4 locomotives are not yet commercially available. Any discussion about additional cost is at best speculation in the absence of data.” 

Still, Metrolinx CEO Robert Prichard has declared himself enthusiastic about the Tier 4s, arguing that it’s worth paying the price for a cleaner environment. At the same time, however, he tells anyone who will listen that electrification for Georgetown is too expensive. 

How the newly named permanent head of the organization knows this is pretty unclear, since Metrolinx just announced the terms of reference for its one-year study on the possibility of electrifying the whole GO system only this past Tuesday, October 20.

Brooks says he’s shocked that Prichard gets away with slagging the electric option for this corridor without proof. “If there are numbers available,” Brooks says, “make them public.”

At the Tuesday Metrolinx meeting, the Coalition asked the org’s executive VP, Gary McNeil, to delay expenditures on diesel-only infrastructure for the Georgetown line until the results of the electrification study are known. McNeil would only agree not to do anything that would “preclude electrification.’’

Electric train proponents point out that the McGuinty government has already decided to electrify another route, the Lakeshore line, by 2020, following a study showing that diesel on this route couldn’t handle ridership increases. (Electric trains stop and start more quickly.) 

Clean Train folks wonder if stonewalling on electric for the Georgetown-airport corridor might have something to do with the private Air Rail Link partnership still being negotiated between the province and SNC-Lavalin.

SNC won’t have to electrify its 140 daily trips unless it’s written in the contract and we won’t know much about these negotiations until the deal is completed. 

When will that happen? Infrastructure Ontario’s Steve Dyck says, “I think we’ll know before too long.” 

In terms of the ministry’s request for diesel 4 locomotives, SNC-Lavalin spokesperson Leslie Quinton cautions, “I don’t know when the industry will be ready [to produce them].”

While Metrolinx continues to block requests for public meetings on the expansion, diesel-hostile residents have hosted their own affairs. On September 26, the Coalition organized a 1,000-strong Human Train walk with neighbourhood rallies from Weston to Trinity Bellwoods. 

Along the route, at Sorauren Park, politicians took turns at the mic, but provincial Liberals remained conspicuously absent, a risky move considering Tony Ruprecht (Davenport) and Laura Albanese (York South-Weston) beat challengers last election by just 5 per cent and 1.5 respectively. 

Toronto’s medical officer of health, Dr. David McKeown, assured the crowd that he supports electric trains, countering a misinformation campaign by Metrolinx. 

Guess you can’t pump diesel without getting dirty, but even some Liberals are now switching sides. At the rally, Liberal MP Gerard Kennedy finally came off the fence, stating “Metrolinx has breeched the trust of this community. If they say it takes a year to do a study for electric trains, then nothing should happen here for a year.”

But when he went on to praise fellow Liberals like Environment Minister Gerretsen, you should have heard the jeers. 

news@nowtoronto.com

METROLINX MYTHS

Metrolinx says Electrification will cost tens of billions.

Reality Experience elsewhere says it costs 100 times less. When asked to reveal cost breakdowns from the Lakeshore electrification study, Metrolinx spokesperson Jacquie Menezes suggests waiting for results from the next study in December 2010. 

Metrolinx says 99 per cent of North American transit uses diesel.

Reality Of North America’s five busiest commuter lines, Metrolinx is alone in not using electric trains for all or a substantial amount of their service.

Metrolinx says That a memorandum has been signed with SNC-Lavalin for an airport rail link.

Reality The province could end private negotiations tomorrow with “no downside or penalties,” says Infrastructure Ontario’s Steve Dyck.

NOW | October 21-28, 2009 | VOL 29 NO 8
Copyright 2010 NOW Communications
Comments
Posted by scottd on 10/22/2009, 09:56 AM
Its amazing how often in stories Metrolinx officials Like O'Mara and Pritchard make bold statements then don't have or won't reveal any information to back them up. I think they are making it up as they go along. Metrolinx a 1909 plan for 2009.

Posted by Surster on 10/22/2009, 10:13 AM
Prichard by his own admission knows nothing of transportation issues, trains, etc. but pontificates that it is too expensive to electrify and offers no substantive documentation to back up his claim. And Metrolinx already has a study that says it would be far less than the 'Billions' that Prichards keeps on about. But he has no problem supporting the electrification of a longer line, Lakeshore. Why? Because he lives in Oakville and can toot his horn in his own hood that he helped to make it happen. Two, when he finally decides to run for the Liberal government, either provincially or federally, having helped to electrify his line, he will be able to garner votes in the 905 which are Conservative votes. A win-win for him and his 'friends'. Who loses? Everyone else in the province who would like the same opportunity to breath easier, live cleaner and quieter. It our money he is spending but we have no say in how he does it.

Posted by Jon on 10/22/2009, 10:23 AM
Good article. I cannot believe with everything going on with air quality in this city that they're putting diesel trains in. I live right neat the tracks and want to raise my kids here, but now I'm very worried. It's awful really. This will be a major factor in how I vote in the future, and if you live in the area I suggest you do the same. I really wish too that Kennedy did something sooner, very disappointing.

Posted by HighParkGirl on 10/22/2009, 02:57 PM
Why would I want a diesel or an electric train to take me to the airport for $18-20 when I can get there now for the price of a token. Another example of government waste.

Posted by Art Tricque on 10/26/2009, 02:30 AM
"any further pollution in Toronto's already overburdened airshed is not acceptable"? So I guess all the eco-minded protesters would prefer potential customers of the Georgetown GO line to take diesel buses or gasoline cars on clogged roads? Yes, that certainly would be less pollution than more diesel trains! What a bunch of hypocrites. Electrification would be lovely, but would cost a whack of money -- whether billions or hundreds of millions -- for track infrastructure, new locomotives, training and maintenance, etc., dollars that would be spent better on improving transit in other ways in the GTA. Oh, and just how -- and where -- would the electricity be generated for the train lines? More transit, even if diesel, equals less total pollution in the GTA. Time for the protesters to stop holding up progress.

Posted by ubik on 10/26/2009, 04:21 AM
I'm suspicious of the numbers claimed on both sides of this debates. Can anyone give sources for the statement made above: "Experience elsewhere says it [electrification] costs 100 times less." This is definitely NOT the case in Europe.

Posted by Helder Ramos on 10/27/2009, 10:27 AM
The Metrolinx plan will send 464 diesel trains through our neighbourhoods each day. They will emit the equivalent exhaust of 9000 trucks!

On October 29, Trinity--Spadina MPP Rosario Marchese will host a discussion on the benefits of electric trains. A Q & A and an Action Plan brainstorming session will follow.

RSVP rmarchese-co@ndp.on.ca or call 416.603.9664

Why the Electric Train Option is Best for Trinity - Spadina by Mike Sullivan Mr. Sullivan is Chair of the Weston Community Coalition and a member of the Clean Train Coalition. Mike has been one of the earliest and most active proponents of electric over diesel trains for the Union-- Georgetown and the Air-Rail Link corridors.

Electric Train Technology by Dr. Avrum Regenstreif Dr. Regenstreif is a resident of Trinity--Spadina, a retired architect, urbanist and consultant in energy management. He has written extensively on railway electrification in Canada and Europe.

October 29, 2009

6:30 pm Registration 7--9 pm Discussion

Array Music Studios 60 Atlantic Ave. Suite 218 (Liberty Village)

Posted by BrocktonDude on 10/27/2009, 08:57 PM
The plan from Metrolinx has the project at about 1 billion dollars right now. That's for diesel. I say that's already a whack of cash. Why spend so much on diesel if they are planning on electrifying later on? Pay twice?? Honestly, some people have this idea that it's only going to cost a lot of money if it goes electric! It's a lot of money either way, so let's do it right the first time, save money, keep residents happy, win win win. Oh, right I forgot that SNC Lavalin would be unhappy, and since they are huge campaign contributors to the liberals, that matters.. Also, I'm glad Gerrard Kennedy is FINALLY saying something- I guess he's trying to save his political skin.. GO ELECTRIC!!! www.cleantrain.ca

Post a comment :

All comments are reviewed. HTML links are not allowed.

Leave this field empty

NEWS POLL
NOW Magazine on Facebook