Share your tip with NOW

William Lyon Mackenzie's rebellion was more exciting than hockey gold.
News

The dying art of sharing something real

Just so we’re clear, even though I was out protesting when the torch came through town, I don’t resent you for being elated by the Games. That would smack too much of jocks vs nerds.

But that doesn’t mean you were making sense walking through Little Italy shouting, “We won! We won!”

No, wait. Listen. The game you just watched was in Vancouver. You and I are in Toronto. What you propose is impossible. 

I’ll make you a deal: if I let you take credit for a hockey game you weren’t in (and if you don’t vomit on my shoes), then you also have to try taking some of the responsibility for a federal government that has contempt for democracy, for the unemployed who can’t get decent EI, for native land theft, the tar sands and military torture.

If you want to lay gushing claim to some shared national (or binational) identity, you can’t just own the good stuff. 

And if the gold belongs to anyone, it’s the people of Vancouver, who took on hundreds of millions in debt. Don’t worry, though, we’d be next, considering how much the feds coughed up – a bil – for security alone. So I guess it was worth it. It certainly was for Canwest.

Writing for the Canadian Journalism Project, civil rights lawyer David Eby (now the Activist Famous for Getting a Pie in the Face after having the temerity to point out that breaking windows wasn’t the best way to protest the Olympics) reminds us that Canwest gave the Yes lobby in the 2003 Vancouver Olympic referendum $1 mil in free advertising. That’s 200 times the entire No budget. 

So it’s no wonder that in lieu of critical reporting we were given the one thing worse than man-on-the-street: drunken-man-on-the-street. The day after the winning goal, Metro quoted one local fan’s sage reflection: “This is the most exciting thing that’s happened in Canada, maybe ever.”

Look, it’s nice to close an article with a quote. I get that. But this is as false as a qualitative statement can be. What about the Farmers Rebellion? A drunken Toronto mayor tried to take down the government with a musket. That’s at least interesting. By most accounts, the FLQ Crisis was also a bit of a nail-biter. Winnipeg General Strike? Quebec City protest of 2001? 

But, then, those were all rooted in actual conflict, the last two especially, involving real risk and repercussions. Olympic ecstasy comes at the cost of a jug. 

I didn’t think anyone a fool for lining up to see the torch, or a total fool for stumbling out to party. I like to imagine that on some deep level this is all practice for a more permanent coming together, some more meaningful mass joy. 

And I found hope Sunday night in seeing people still willing to go outside on the streets to share something real with other real people in real time. That is a dying art.

We saw ourselves in Team Canada for a night. I wonder what it would be like to see ourselves in each other every day.

news@nowtoronto.com

NOW | March 3-10, 2010 | VOL 29 NO 27
blog comments powered by Disqus
Older Comments
Posted by brocklinehan on 03/04/2010, 10:10 PM
A typically self-loathing article by a typically moronic Now columnist. Referencing the FLQ crisis, the Farmer's Rebellion, etc was a little heavy handed. That local fan talked about the game being exciting, and the best you can come up with was the FLQ crisis? Look, if you don't feel you want to celebrate something that obviously means very much to millions of Canadians, that's your choice. You won't be missed. But don't criticize people for doing just that.

If you're not proud of this country, that's fine. You can write about all it's flaws and missteps. No country is perfect. But it's our home. It's where we're from and where millions of people from all over the world aspire to live. Right now, there's a huge wave of national pride sweeping this country. Despite what you would want people to believe, that is a very, very good thing, and it's long overdue. That might not be the hip, urban attitude that NOW so very much wants to represent, but it's here, and you can choke on it.

Posted by Mike Smith on 03/05/2010, 11:00 AM
Brock, I'm not sure you know what the phrase "self-loathing" means. Or the words "most" and "ever."

I'm also interested in why you think a "huge wave of national pride sweeping this country" is necessarily a good thing. Pride is totally neutral, ethically. What are people proud of? Why? What is it inspiring them to do? How would things be different if they didn't feel it?

I wasn't criticizing, I was suggesting that people take the next step and apply that laudable need for connection and pride to something tangible and constructive. I thought that was pretty clear, but it sounds like you decided to disagree and be angry about one paragraph in.

Posted by Brocklinehan on 03/08/2010, 12:59 PM
Mike: The reasons for pride are totally objective. You can't judge on the validity of such a thing. Also, who are you to know whether or not that next step is not taken? People do good things all the time for many different reasons including something as mundane as pride in a country.

You should go back and read your own article. You WERE criticizing. What do YOU do that's tangible and constructive? Protesting the Olympic torch is neither. It merely reveals you as being a bit of a busybody.

You ask why I think that the demonstration of pride in country is a good thing. I ask "why not"? People are proud of different things and inspired by different things. Nobody's going to walk around saying "I'm a proud Canadian, and therefore I'm going to work in a food bank". It doesn't work that way. In case you haven't noticed, pride is something which normally manifests itself in a quiet way in Canada. The fact that we've used the Olympics as an excuse to express our pride in a more demonstrative fashion is something that should not be frowned upon.

The fact that you've written this article at all shows me that nothing is really very clear to you. You're article didn't make me angry. On the contrary, it made me feel a bit sad that some people just don't get it. So Mike, tell me what you do that's laudable. Give me an example of what you think people should do with their pride. What is worthwhile to you? I would really like to know. Because Mike, protesting the Olympic torch didn't really work for you, now did it?

Recent

Join the conversation
NOW Magazine on Facebook
LISTINGS
Sunday May 27