Dylan Juckes and Ginette Mohr can’t rise above story’s clichés.
THE BELLE OF WINNIPEG by the ensemble, directed by Richard Beaune (Keystone Theatre). At Winchester Street Theatre (80 Winchester). To November 15. $17.50-$22. 416-967-1365. See listing.
NOW Rating N N N N N  
Reader's Rating
Theatre Reviews

The Belle of Winnipeg
’Peg unpegged

Going in, I assumed this theatrical experiment would live or die by its central stylistic choice: to recreate a silent-era film onstage. No dialogue, black and white props and costumes, Chaplinesque acting – the whole nine yards.

Yet even though the cast and crew nail the look, sound and feel of early cinema, the story doesn’t work. This is where adhering too closely to the silent era falters; the clichéd tale of saloon brothels and damsels in distress is too long and uninvolving.

Set in 1882 Winnipeg during an economic downturn, the play feels like a long train ride through the prairies: nice scenery, but not much of real interest. When the novelty of its antiquated style, revived in a unique way, wears off, its 90 minutes drag on.

That’s a shame, because there’s so much to like. Musical director/pianist David Atkinson almost steals the show, providing non-stop accompaniment that perfectly follows the action onstage.

Alvin Campana’s video work is also effective. Projected period photos or loops of old film constantly flicker, creating a great backdrop, while title cards with dialogue are cut to when needed.

Scott McCulloch is very creepy as the evil physician, and, as Belle, the naive runaway bride, Ginette Mohr conveys loads of emotion with physicality alone – no easy feat.

But no matter how creative and well-executed the production values, 90 minutes is too much for this weak, melodramatic plot. A collection of silent shorts would have worked better. 

stage@nowtoronto.com 

NOW | November 11-18, 2009 | VOL 29 NO 11
Copyright 2010 NOW Communications
Comments
Posted by stevie_q on 11/11/2009, 11:50 PM
Can't say I agree at all, show was hilarious! If anything, I wanted more. Was fun, well paced and innovative. This show deserves a long run. Haven't seen anything like it.

Posted by Mary Jane on 11/12/2009, 01:28 PM
I couldn't hype this show enough to my friends ~ the fact that the reviewer thought it was too long shows that modern day theatrics and blockbuster films have taken away the lure of a good story. We don't need big crashes and sound effects or lighting fx to make a story fantastic. this show was fantastic not only because the acting was solid but the theme and genre was solid - they never gave up their pursuit to bring silent film to stage.

Kudos to the cast and production team, I can't wait to see what they do next! 5 stars!

Posted by Stacy on 11/12/2009, 01:39 PM
I'd also have to disagree with this review - as a fan of silent-era films, I felt this play did a great job of both celebrating and updating silent film tropes to a contemporary theatre format. If the story dragged, I was laughing too much to notice!

Posted by Pen_Kenner on 11/13/2009, 03:53 AM
Saw it tonight. AMAZING. Wasn't expecting much based on this review, but was totally blown away, creative crazy stuff happening in this show, GO SEE IT!

Post a comment :

All comments are reviewed. HTML links are not allowed.

Leave this field empty
Rhubarb Festival

NOW Magazine on Facebook